http://coldfusion3.com/blog/australian-company-not-developing-cold-fusion Cold Fusion Energy & LENR News Sat, 18 May 2013 17:24:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 http://coldfusion3.com/blog/australian-company-not-developing-cold-fusion#comment-88 jennifer Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:56:18 +0000 http://coldfusion3.com/?p=484#comment-88 Thanks Thanks

]]> http://coldfusion3.com/blog/australian-company-not-developing-cold-fusion#comment-84 Henry Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:36:22 +0000 http://coldfusion3.com/?p=484#comment-84 @ Andrew. Wow, glad you made some corrections. Wrong information can be dangerous. @ Andrew. Wow, glad you made some corrections. Wrong information can be dangerous.

]]> http://coldfusion3.com/blog/australian-company-not-developing-cold-fusion#comment-82 Andrew Horvath Sun, 28 Aug 2011 21:48:09 +0000 http://coldfusion3.com/?p=484#comment-82 I just thought I should make a correction or two to your article. Muon Catalysed Fusion is a well known process first discovered 60 years ago (see papers by Jackson). The process uses the decay product of a negative pion, a negative muon, to replace a electron around a deuterium molecule. Being significantly heavier than the electron the muon moves closer to the deuterium drawing them closer until they fuse. The issue has been the energy cost of producing the pions on mass to have a sustained fusion reaction. Star Scientific's research has focused on this mass production of pions to produce the muon catalyst. The reference you make to seawater is incorrect, we see seawater as a source of deuterium to fuel the process as do other fusion projects including so called cold fusion processes. Muon catalysed fusion is not cold fusion but has no relation to plasma fusion projects such as ITER or General Fusion. Star Scientific is happy with its prototypes to date and are designing a pilot plant to show how mass energy production from this system will be possible. On one final note of correction I did not start the company on my own, the company has many shareholders globally and I am the currently elected executive chairman. I would urge anyone who wishes to know more to look at www.starscientific.com.au. I just thought I should make a correction or two to your article. Muon Catalysed Fusion is a well known process first discovered 60 years ago (see papers by Jackson). The process uses the decay product of a negative pion, a negative muon, to replace a electron around a deuterium molecule. Being significantly heavier than the electron the muon moves closer to the deuterium drawing them closer until they fuse. The issue has been the energy cost of producing the pions on mass to have a sustained fusion reaction. Star Scientific’s research has focused on this mass production of pions to produce the muon catalyst. The reference you make to seawater is incorrect, we see seawater as a source of deuterium to fuel the process as do other fusion projects including so called cold fusion processes. Muon catalysed fusion is not cold fusion but has no relation to plasma fusion projects such as ITER or General Fusion. Star Scientific is happy with its prototypes to date and are designing a pilot plant to show how mass energy production from this system will be possible. On one final note of correction I did not start the company on my own, the company has many shareholders globally and I am the currently elected executive chairman. I would urge anyone who wishes to know more to look at http://www.starscientific.com.au.

]]>